The Research
Integrity Council.
We do not vote on truth. We test for it. The Council is a gauntlet of adversarial constraints that every piece of research must survive to reach the public domain.
Verification Topology
The process of establishing integrity is subtractive. We subject internal research to a series of automated filters designed to strip away hallucination, error, and hazard.
Council Protocols
The "members" of the council are invariant tests. They cannot be bribed, rushed, or persuaded. They execute logic.
Reproducibility Daemon
Automated rebuild environments. If the research results cannot be reproduced from raw code/weights within 0.1% variance, the submission is rejected immediately.
Adversarial Critic
Model is subjected to "hostile intent" prompts (jailbreaks, deception triggers) by an automated Red Team suite. Any successful breach halts the release pipeline.
Safety Bounds Checker
Static analysis of model weights against the Core Safety Charter. Scans for capability overhangs, bio-risk knowledge, and autonomous replication patterns.
Citations Auditor
Cross-references every claim against a cryptographic ledger of verified prior knowledge. Unverified hallucinations are flagged for manual review.
The Tribunal Docket
A public ledger of research that has passed or failed the integrity gauntlet.
| Reference ID | Subject Matter | Date | Verdict | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x8f9...2a1 | Supernarrow ASI Framework | 2025-10-14 | RATIFIED | Verified |
| 0x7b2...c99 | Recursive Self-Improvement v0.1 | 2025-10-02 | WITHHELD | CRITICAL: Reward hacking detected during Phase 2. |
| 0x3d4...e11 | Multi-Agent Coordination | 2025-09-28 | RATIFIED | Verified |
| 0x1a9...f44 | Context Window Ext. (1M) | 2025-09-15 | REMANDED | Failed reproducibility check on Cluster B. |
Integrity is Binary
There is no "partial" truth in safety-critical systems. Either the research survives the gauntlet, or it remains in the dark.