Governing
Advanced Systems.
We view corporate governance not as bureaucracy, but as an engineering constraint. Our structure is designed to decouple safety incentives from profit incentives.
Structure.fig
Founding Team
L1Fiduciary duty & deployment authorization.
Safety Security Council
L2Risk assessment & hazard analysis.
Scientific Review
L3Methodology validation & peer review.
Alignment Engineering
L4Constitutional AI training & RLHF.
Structural Independence
The Safety Security Council operates independently of the Founding Team. They possess a "Unilateral Halt" capability—a mechanism that allows them to freeze deployment pipelines if specific safety thresholds are breached, without requiring Board approval.
- 01No equity-based compensation for Safety Council members to prevent profit misalignment.
- 02Board meetings regarding safety are open to non-voting external observers.
Deployment Pipeline
We treat model governance as a continuous integration problem. Safety checks are automated, blocking, and rigorous.
Spec & Hazard Analysis
Pre-compute definition of capability bounds and potential failure modes.
Model Training
Training runs monitored by automated intervention systems for reward hacking.
Automated Red Teaming
Continuous adversarial simulation using synthetic attack vectors to probe for safety boundary failures.
Phased Deployment
Logarithmic scale-up of user access with real-time anomaly detection.
Emergency
Interlocks
Hard-coded operational halts. These triggers execute purely on logic gates, bypassing executive hierarchy to prevent catastrophic failure modes.
Capability Threshold Breach
Immediate Training Halt
Alignment Drift > 2%
Rollback to Previous Checkpoint
Whistleblower Report
External Audit Triggered
Radical Transparency.
Verify, don't trust.
We believe that powerful systems must operate in the light. We publish verifiable system cards, automated adversarial testing logs, and live safety telemetry.
0x7f8a9b2c3d4e5f6a7b8c9d0e1f2a3b4c5d6e7f8a