Safety Evaluation Protocol

Adversarial Hardening.

We employ a policy of continuous red teaming to identify and mitigate emergent risks. Our models are stress-tested against state-of-the-art attack vectors before deployment.

Evaluation Domains

Our safety evaluations cover the entire surface area of the model lifecycle, from pre-training alignment to real-time inference monitoring.

MET-01

Adversarial Prompting

Automated generation of multi-turn dialogues designed to override system instructions via persona adoption or semantic pressure.

Status: 12.4M Iterations
MET-02

Model Weight Probing

Analysis of internal activation patterns to identify latent capabilities that bypass RLHF safety layers.

Status: Active Scan
MET-03

Data Exfiltration

Stress-testing for training data leakage using high-entropy extraction techniques and differential privacy audits.

Status: 99.9% Refusal
Reporting Protocol

Responsible
Disclosure

We operate a strict safe-harbor policy for researchers who identify safety vulnerabilities. All critical reports are triaged by our Safety Council within 12 hours.

security@blankline.org
01

Submission

Secure report via encrypted channel (PGP Required).

02

Triage

Impact assessment & technical validation by the red team.

03

Mitigation

Architectural patching or model retraining (RLHF).

04

Disclosure

Coordinated public advisory after remediation.

Vulnerability Registry

Transparent log of verified vulnerabilities and their remediation status.

IdentifierCVE CodeDescriptionSeverityFixed
VULN-2025-09SFT-09Multi-turn Context Exhaustion2025-11-14CRITICAL4h
VULN-2025-08SEC-12Unicode Encoding Bypass2025-10-21HIGH8h
VULN-2025-07PII-04Pattern-Based Telemetry Leak2025-09-02HIGH12h